Bloomsbury Design Library
Loading
Design and the Question of History

Design and the Question of History

by Tony Fry

Tony Fry is Director of the sustainment consultancy Team D/E/S and Professor of Design, Griffith University, Queensland College of Art. He is also author of Design Futuring: Sustainability, Ethics and New Practice (Berg, 2008) and Design as Politics (Berg, 2010). Author affiliation details are correct at time of print publication.

Search for publications
, Clive Dilnot

Clive Dilnot is professor of Design Studies at Parsons The New School for Design, New York, USA. Recent publications include Ethics? Design? (2005) and, as co-author, Design and the Question of History (Bloomsbury, 2014). Author affiliation details are correct at time of print publication.

Search for publications
and Susan C. Stewart

Susan C. Stewart is Director of Postgraduate Studies and Curriculum Development, Design School, University of Technology Sydney, Australia. Author affiliation details are correct at time of print publication.

Search for publications
Bloomsbury Academic, 2015
  • DOI:
    10.5040/9781474245890
  • ISBN:
    978-1-4742-4589-0 (online)

    978-0-8578-5476-6 (hardback)

    978-0-8578-5477-3 (paperback)

    978-1-4725-8934-7 (epdf)

    978-1-4725-2160-6 (epub)
  • Edition:
    First published
  • Place of Publication:
    London
  • Published Online:
    2017 2017
Design and the Question of History
Collapse All Sections

Design and the Question of History is not a work of Design History. Rather, it is a mixture of mediation, advocacy and polemic that takes seriously the directive force of design as an historical actor in and upon the world. Understanding design as a shaper of worlds within which the political, ethical and historical character of human being is at stake, this text demands radically transformed notions of both design and history. Above all, the authors posit history as the generational site of the future. Blindness to history, it is suggested, blinds us both to possibility, and to the foreclosure of possibilities, enacted through our designing.

The text is not a resolved, continuous work, presented through one voice. Rather, the three authors cut across each other, presenting readers with the task of disclosing, to themselves, the commonalities, repetitions and differences within the deployed arguments, issues, approaches and styles from which the text is constituted. This is a work of friendship, of solidarity in difference, an act of cultural politics. It invites the reader to take a position – it seeks engagement over agreement.